Discussion about this post

User's avatar
samdiago's avatar

Great take especially the emphasis on not getting swept up in the hype and instead focusing on where generative AI actually creates business value.

The point about corpus, context, and use case really stands out. A lot of enterprise conversations still revolve around “using AI” in general, but as you highlighted, the real differentiation comes from how well the model is aligned to specific data and business context.

What I’m seeing in practice is similar many teams experiment broadly at first, but the ones that get real traction are the ones that narrow down to high-impact, well-defined use cases embedded in existing workflows. Otherwise, it just becomes surface-level experimentation without measurable outcomes.

Also interesting is the idea that generative AI isn’t really optional anymore it’s being embedded into everything, so the real challenge is prioritization rather than adoption.

Curious how you see this evolving:

Do you think enterprises will move toward a few deeply integrated AI use cases, or continue spreading efforts across multiple smaller experiments?

https://atechreview.com/

No posts

Ready for more?